<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation
- To: <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:20:07 +0200
Thanks Bill, I agree
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Mai 2010 12:14
An: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation
Hi
On May 29, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
45 days is okay, so we probably should give the SGs 3
weeks thereby leaving 3 weeks if needed for the Council. If any SGs
find 3 weeks as too short we could extend it to 24 days and still stay
within the 45 days and still allow 3 weeks for Council action if needed.
Ok, 21 days it is. Please see attached. I believe I cleaned up
(simplified) some bits of language, let me know if there are issues.
Otherwise I can send this to Council Monday.
Best,
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|