ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation

  • To: <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:20:07 +0200

Thanks Bill, I agree




        Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
        Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Mai 2010 12:14
        An: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Betreff: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Text for Circulation

        On May 29, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

                45 days is okay, so we probably should give the SGs 3
weeks thereby leaving 3 weeks if needed for the Council.  If any SGs
find 3 weeks as too short we could extend it to 24 days and still stay
within the 45 days and still allow 3 weeks for Council action if needed.

        Ok, 21 days it is.  Please see attached.  I believe I cleaned up
(simplified) some bits of language, let me know if there are issues.
Otherwise I can send this to Council Monday.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy