Re: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok I've heard from everyone who's been active in this discussion except for 
Tim.  Time are you ok with the doc, can I send it and the motion to council?

BD


On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:58 AM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm fine, too. Thanks 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im 
> Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Mai 2010 14:49
> An: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; Caroline Greer; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; William 
> Drake
> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
> 
> 
> Me too.
> 
> Chuck
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:19 AM
>> To: Caroline Greer; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; William Drake; Gomes,
>> Chuck
>> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
>> 
>> Fine with me too.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:19:51
>> To: William Drake<william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Gomes,
>> Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
>> 
>> 
>> I am fine with that qualifications paragraph Bill.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Caroline.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of William Drake
>> Sent: 28 May 2010 10:11
>> To: Gomes, Chuck
>> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
>> Importance: High
>> 
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding
>> opening the call for AoC RT applicants.  As soon as we have our draft
>> process, I would like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects.
>> Can
>> we finalize the proposed process not later than tomorrow so that Bill
>> may send it to the Council list by then?  If so, then I will send it
> as
>> a draft to Marco & Janis.
>> 
>> Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent
>> process seems to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on the
>> latter.  To finalize we need clarification from selectors et al on the
>> expected regular RT time cycles so contracted folk can decide how long
>> they can have after the calls close, bearing in mind the potentially
>> three week wait after that to the next council call.  When you reach
>> closure we'll plug in the number.
>> 
>> Also was this suggestion on the qualifications ok with people
>> 
>>> 7. A two to three paragraph statement about the applicant's
> knowledge
>>> of the GNSO community and its structure and operations, and any
>> details
>>> of his/her participation therein or, in the event that an applicant
>> has not been involved in the GNSO community,
>>> a two to three paragraph statement attesting to knowledge of the
>> substantive issues for which the GNSO is responsible.
>> 
> 
> 

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************