ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ccwg-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Cross community working groups

  • To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Cross community working groups
  • From: "Rosemary Sinclair" <Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:29:30 +1000

Hi Glen

Could you update email to Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx

Cheers

Rosemary


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Glen de Saint Géry
Sent: Thu 6/16/2011 2:01 AM
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Cross community working groups
 

Dear All,

The document has been posted on:
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts

and can be directly viewed at:
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/ccwg-icann-framework-14jun11-en.pdf

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org

From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: lundi 13 juin 2011 17:58
To: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Cross community working groups

Hi All,

I have made a revision to the discussion document I previously circulated, not 
redlined I am afraid.

The current version aims to absorb all of the recent online and in-meeting 
discussion as well as the reference material.

However, it is still a little rough in some areas and I'd appreciate any input 
on structure or content.

Significantly, the way forward suggested by ICANN staff in the form of Draft 
Principles seem to me to be succinct and sound and to effectively respond to 
key concerns raised to date.

So the two key questions that you might have in mind when reading the attached 
are:

1. Does it accurately and effectively describe the reason for the work.
2. Does the way forward adequately cover our / your view and represent a sound 
and comprehensive basis for GNSO and then wider consensus.

I look forward to any input or comment on this that you may be able to provide 
ahead of Singapore.

Best wishes,


Jonathan








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy