RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Update following the Dakar meeting

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Liz,

 

Thanks again for your help with this.  

 

Looking ahead to today's call, I suggest we work to the following agenda:

 

1.       Administrative matters

a.       Participants - deletions / additions to the DT

b.      Any suggested additions

c.       Dates & time/s for future calls

2.       Continued review of the Draft Principles
(Follow-on from point 3 below)

3.       Way forward / Deliverables

 

If it is possible to put up this agenda as well as the Dakar edited version
of the draft principles in the Adobe Connect room, that will be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: 01 November 2011 19:48
To: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Update following the Dakar meeting

 

All,

 

Many thanks to those who were able to participate in our (early AM local
time!) Dakar meeting.  Special thanks in particular to Edmon Chung, Alan
Greenberg and Wendy Seltzer for offering their detailed and thoughtful
assessments of cross-community WGs based on their extensive experiences as
active participants and chairs of several recent Cross-SO and AC groups.
The speakers highlighted areas of importance that should be considered
carefully when developing principles applicable to such groups.  Those who
were not able to attend the session are strongly encouraged to review the
transcript
(http://dakar42.icann.org/meetings/dakar2011/transcript-ccwg-27oct11-en.pdf
).

 

Key meeting points:

 

1.       Presentations and Initial discussion:  The initial discussion
focused around key themes emphasized by the first speakers, including: the
need for clearly defined scope; the importance of understanding the
perspectives (and processes) of each SO and AC and the need to recognize
unique aspects of each SO and AC; and the desire to strike an appropriate
balance between simplicity and allowing the flexibility to accommodate
varying processes of SOs and ACs while retaining enough structure and rules
to ensure confidence and predictability in how these groups conduct their
work.

 

2.       Discussion of next steps:  The group agreed with a suggestion made
by Chuck Gomes to seek GNSO Council concurrence to reach out in short order
to other SOs and ACs to work collaboratively on the principles and rules
applicable to CWGs as a way to accelerate progress by this group.

 

3.       The group began reviewing and editing the draft principles that
have previously been circulated (see slides pp. 8-9 here:
http://dakar42.icann.org/meetings/dakar2011/presentation-ccwg-27oct11-en.pdf
).  Due to time limitations, the group did not complete this discussion -
redline edits are included in the attached (reformatted as a Word document)
so that you can follow the discussion - we only began to discuss the first
"practice".  This can be continued on our upcoming call - please look for
the "doodle" which will be sent shortly to find a time for the group to meet
next week.

 

Please let me know if I've missed any edits that were discussed - these are
a work in progress by the group.

 

Best regards, Liz

 

  _____  

This email has been scanned by Westcoastcloud.
http://www.westcoastcloud.com

  _____  



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6593 (20111101) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com