ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ccwg-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Revised principles "chart" for your review

  • To: "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Revised principles "chart" for your review
  • From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:32:36 -0700

Wow!

Excellent work on this Liz.  I have made some very modest comments with
the aim, as the song goes, "to accentuate the positive, eliminate the
negative."

Cheers,

Berard

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Revised principles "chart" for your review
From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, November 15, 2011 2:01 pm
To: "gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi all,
 
Attached please find a revised Principles “chart” for our next call,
which will be finalized shortly for 22 November (time TBD).  Those who
were able to participate at the last meeting may recall that we decided
to reformat the draft principles for CWGs into a chart form that would
include a column for “rationale”.  I took the liberty of providing
some draft ideas for rationale that might expedite the drafting of these
points.  Please feel free to toss these and provide your own – just
intended to be helpful.
 
On last week’s call, the DT also asked the GNSO Secretariat to reach
out to several people who had previously expressed an interest in
joining the group, and several names have been added to the DT list as a
result.  We are setting up a wiki page for this group which will be made
available later this week.  Participant information will be updated on
that page.
 
The group further confirmed its intent at the appropriate time to seek
support from the GNSO Council to solicit the participation of other SOs
and ACs to collaborate on these draft principles once this group agreed
the draft was ready to be shared with those key stakeholders. This could
be done by circulating a preliminary set of principles for input subject
to final GNSO comment, or by inviting SO and AC representatives to join
a drafting team for that purpose.  The DT may wish to confirm these
steps at an upcoming meeting.
 
Please review the attached, noting that the draft language under
“Rationale” are my personal thoughts at this time and nothing more. 
All edits appreciated.
 
Best regards, Liz

Attachment: Draft Principles for CWGs_jb.doc
Description: MS-Word document



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy