<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ccwg-dt] Comments on the 22 Nov 2011 version
- To: <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Comments on the 22 Nov 2011 version
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:52:43 -0500
1.i To provide information and recommendations to the chartering
organizations.
I think that this is a bit insular. Surely at least in some cases,
the purpose will be to provide information and recommendations to the
wider ICANN community, even if to get their they need to be approved
by the chartering bodies. DSSA is a good example.
1.ii A discussion forum to achieve greater community understanding
either prior to a PDP to help define issues and concerns, or
following a PDP to provide implementation recommendations or related guidance.
This sounds like this would be the prime reason for starting a CWG
and in reality, that may not be the case (again, look at DSSA).
Perhaps changing "Purpose" to "Possible Purposes could include" would fix it.
1.a.i Apply appropriate SO WG Guidelines to all CWGs whenever possible.
At the very least, SO should be AC/SO as in other cases. But the word
"applicable" also comes to mind.
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|