Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

A few comments.

- My understanding of "majority" is more than half, which would 
increase the "simple majority" be one in cases where the number of 
votes is even.
- There is a typo for the BGC majority line. "1" is a mite low for a majority.
- Although I don't think it matters in these cases, a super majority 
is defined as >66%, which could be less the 2/3 in some cases.
Also, on reviewing Jon's voting threshold spreadsheet, I note that 
the vote required to initiate an issues report is 25%, not >25%.
Alan

At 09/07/2008 05:13 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> The attached excel chart may help us all assess various voting / 
> seats scenarios.
> It has 16 options but is not exhaustive.
>
> I submit it in the interests of debate and am not taking a position 
> on any option here listed or not.
> Philip