Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think this is pure speculation based on what some people would like  
the result of the Nomcom review to be.
As I believe the current role of the Nomcom appointees is appropriate  
and necessary, I do not see it as reasonable to base the thinking on  
such a projection.
a.


On 10 Jul 2008, at 10:54, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> One issue we have not addressed is the nomcom review and a change of  
> role to experts not
> adjudicators.
>
> If nomcom delegates were experts (on for example consumer law,  
> competition, consumer
> protection etc, etc) they could still be on Council but be non-voting.
>
> The challenge is to define the role not the number.
>
> Philip