<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] An alternative proposal for GNSO Structure
- To: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] An alternative proposal for GNSO Structure
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:55:30 -0400
Milton's idea is worth considering.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:27 PM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] An alternative proposal for
> GNSO Structure
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > Further, i think a condition that might be accepted is that
> of the two
> > voting nomcom appointees, one be selected with commercial
> background
> > and one selected with non-commercial background - though the
> > definition is tricky and what does one do about people who have a
> > mixed background? -Does breadth of experience disqualify
> someone for
> > nomcom appointment.
>
> It's a good point, but if we go down this road Nomcom should
> be instructed to pick someone whose current
> interests/passions center more on commercial or noncommercial
> problems/issues/approaches, and not ask "are you now or have
> you ever been...." It is not background, but current
> propensity that matters. John Gilmore made a fortune in
> computers but founded the EFF. I'd be happy to have him as a
> Nomcom appointee to GNSO. ;-) Maybe we should consider a
> mechanism similar to the Chair: Nomcom provides a list of
> nominess and the nocommercial groups vote on the
> noncommercial ones and the commercial groups vote on the
> commercial ones.
>
> Milton Mueller
> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
> ------------------------------
> Internet Governance Project:
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|