RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concepts

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Philip,
 
Are you speaking for the BC only or for all three commercial
constituencies?
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
        Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:34 AM
        To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concepts
        
        
        For clarity
         
        1. The proposal that Chuck posted is fundamentally not
acceptable as seat allocation to the commercial group is below our
minimum acceptable threshold.
        So I see no need to comment on the other elements.
         
        2. The Bi-Cameral approach
        I am consulting on this. At first blush I like the fresh
approach and the idea . We need to think through the PDP thresholds.
         
        3. And by the way would be interesting to hear feedback on the
compromise I submitted.
         
        Philip