<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-consensus-wg] a possible wrinkle
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] a possible wrinkle
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:19:52 -0400
Hi,
Again apologies for what may be considered by some as a disruptive
question, but these occur to me while jogging and when i can't answer
them by myself, I figure I should ask the group in the effort to leave
no stone unturned.
One of the conversations included a mention that the ISPC constituency
was as much Provider as it was Consumer/User. Additionally during our
conversations with Roberto, he indicated that perhaps some of the
companies involved in this constituency could fit into at least 2
different stakeholder groups.
So, my question, while we are dealing with the complexity of a bi-
cameral solution, a complexity I still do not see the value in, is it
perhaps worth considering that some the commercial user side of the
ISPC would situate itself in one chamber, while the provider side of
ISPC would situate itself in the other.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|