FW: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept

["Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

If I understand your point (and I am not sure I do) it is a non problem,
because it is easily avoided by specifying in the bylaws that the
definition of supermajority is a fixed percentage relative to the number
of voters in a chamber.

> -----Original Message-----
> Perhaps we could address the problem of one
> stakeholder group voting against a consensus
> policy and the effectively vetoing is would be to
> define a super majority as 2/3 in one house and a simple majority in
the
> other.
> 
> Alan
>