RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept

["Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-
>   is the NA appointed by the nomcom specifically for the assigned
> chamber?  or does the chamber choose from a slate of potential NAs?

I would support only the former.

> 
> - is the one commercial NA non commercial  NA formula still
applicable?

How could it be? There is only one per chamber. 

> - will the numbers of participants in each of the chambers be preset
> by by-law or will it be up to the machinations within each of the
> chambers?  can a chamber that starts off with internal parity decide
> to move away from such parity?

It should probably be set by by-law, because the second option is
unacceptable. but it could differ across chambers.

> btw, the more i think about this solution the more i believe it is way
> complex and likely to have many unintended effects.  one positive
> unintended effect will be that we will be more then able to
> accommodate requests for longer review cycles.
> 
> 
> 
> a.