[gnso-consensus-wg] how to fit 3 NAs in the bicameral model

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

The problem with how one splits 3 NA in the bicameral can possibly be  
solved by:
- 1 in the 'contracted parties'  perhaps someone with a technical  
background
- 2 in the non-contracted  one from the C and one from the NC  
community.  this can work to offset the loss of voting percentage that  
would occur if the number of non NA people in the non-contracted  
chamber is > 8
i.e  if one chamber is 4,4,1 and the other is 8,8,2  then the vote  
proportons are equal.

In all cases these NAs should be outside people whose careers are not  
involved in ICANN politics/policies.
Not saying i accept and understand the bicameral model yet, but do  
think that accommodating the model to 3 NAs is essential.
a.