Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] a possible wrinkle

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Certainly some of potential ISPC members are also Registrars. I 
haven't checked our various rules, but I suspect that Deutsche 
Telekom (for instance) could be a member of our current either the 
ISPC or the Registrars Consts., or probably both simultaneously. I 
don't see how this changes in the new proposed structure.
Of course it could get a bit interesting is the same person was 
chosen as a council rep for the two different constituencies/stakeholders.
Alan

At 19/07/2008 02:19 PM, you wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Again apologies for what may be considered by some as a disruptive
> question, but these occur to me while jogging and when i can't answer
> them by myself, I figure I should ask the group in the effort to leave
> no stone unturned.
>
> One of the conversations included a mention that the ISPC constituency
> was as much Provider as it was Consumer/User.  Additionally during our
> conversations with Roberto, he indicated that perhaps some of the
> companies involved in this constituency could fit into at least 2
> different stakeholder groups.
>
> So, my question, while we are dealing with the complexity of a bi- 
> cameral solution, a complexity I still do not see the value in, is it
> perhaps worth considering that some the commercial user side of the
> ISPC would situate itself in one chamber, while the provider side of
> ISPC would situate itself in the other.
>
> a.