<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Draft 17 July Meeting Report and Proposal Tally Sheet
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Draft 17 July Meeting Report and Proposal Tally Sheet
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:50:18 +0200
hi,
at this point, the only option I support is 15. i believe this
exercise has shown me why the BGC ended up where they did. I think
Jon's variations are ok as well.
i suppose a variant of 20 might still be possible, but I do not know
what it would look like or understand how it would work.
a.
On 20 Jul 2008, at 04:59, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
I’ll tally all results that I get from the group by early morning on
22 July, unless I get all your responses sooner.
<2008-07-17 GNSO Consensus Group Meeting Report.doc><GNSO Reform
Options Tally Sheet 2008-07-19 rlh.xls>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|