<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
 
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:20:11 +0200
 
 
 
hi,
thanks for the update.
 sorry i wasn't clear about the alternate option i was suggesting for  
director's elections.
      simple majority of both houses, but requires that at least one  
representative of at least 3 of the 4 stakeholder groups support.   
Nominations for seat 14 come
from Contracted partyies council and nominations for seat 13 come from  
Users parties council.
a.
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |