<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:20:11 +0200
hi,
thanks for the update.
sorry i wasn't clear about the alternate option i was suggesting for
director's elections.
simple majority of both houses, but requires that at least one
representative of at least 3 of the 4 stakeholder groups support.
Nominations for seat 14 come
from Contracted partyies council and nominations for seat 13 come from
Users parties council.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|