Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 23 Jul 2008, at 08:10, philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:

> Also, the BC does not support an imposed non com chair - we prefer an
> elected chair with majority of both houses

Do they approve of an independent chair and if so are you looking at:

- the idea of a slate of candidates to choose submitted by Nomcom
- nominations of people from the outside by the house and then a vote  
similar to that for directors.

Or are you thinking of someone who comes out of one the houses.


Also, if the chair is no longer an independent brought through the  
Nomcom process, the dropping of Nomcom presence in the council from 3  
to 2 becomes a problem again.  As I have explained, I think the  
independant/public interest presence is already too low.
a.