Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Election of Directors

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

isn't 13 the next seat to be voted on?  why not start with that one?

a.

On 23 Jul 2008, at 20:28, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> I would like to throw out another option for election of directors:
> 	• At the end of the current term for Seat 14, Seats 13 and 14 both  
> may not be held by individuals who are employed by, an agent of, or  
> receive any compensation from an ICANN-accredited registry or  
> registrar, nor may they both be held by individuals who are members  
> of or directly involved in one of the GNSO user stakeholder groups.  
> Either seat may be held by an individual directly involved with a  
> contracted party or a user stakeholder group, but not both at the  
> same time, thereby fostering the theme of parity between contracted  
> and non-contracted parties.
> 	• Voting threshold: 2/3 of one house or simple majority of both  
> houses.
> Chuck