<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:44:13 +0200
Hi,
does this mean the board could choose 2x4 for each house? or even
2x3 ...?
a.
On 24 Jul 2008, at 22:09, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
I’d like to propose that we agree to the following language with
regard to composition of the houses:
Contracted Party House – an equal number of registry and registrar
representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative. The
number of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by
the ICANN Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but
shall not exceed 4 representatives for each group.
User/Non-Contracted Party House – an equal number of commercial and
non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
representative. The number of commercial and non-commercial
stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input
from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8
representatives for each group.
Thanks.
Jon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|