<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
 
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:44:13 +0200
 
 
 
Hi,
 does this mean the board could choose 2x4 for each house?  or even  
2x3 ...?
a.
On 24 Jul 2008, at 22:09, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
 I’d like to propose that we agree to the following language with  
regard to composition of the houses:
 Contracted Party House – an equal number of registry and registrar  
representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative.  The  
number of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by  
the ICANN Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but  
shall not exceed 4 representatives for each group.
 User/Non-Contracted Party House – an equal number of commercial and  
non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee  
representative.  The number of commercial and non-commercial  
stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input  
from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8  
representatives for each group.
Thanks.
Jon
  
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |