<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:43:20 -0400
Jon, this language has my support, though I would hope that the size of
the two houses does not end up at the maximum number specified.
--Milton
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:09 PM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
I'd like to propose that we agree to the following language with regard
to composition of the houses:
Contracted Party House - an equal number of registry and registrar
representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative. The number
of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN
Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed
4 representatives for each group.
User/Non-Contracted Party House - an equal number of commercial and
non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
representative. The number of commercial and non-commercial
stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input from
these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8 representatives for
each group.
Thanks.
Jon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|