ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition

  • To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
  • From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:43:20 -0400

Jon, this language has my support, though I would hope that the size of
the two houses does not end up at the maximum number specified. 

--Milton

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:09 PM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition

 

I'd like to propose that we agree to the following language with regard
to composition of the houses:

 

Contracted Party House - an equal number of registry and registrar
representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative.  The number
of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN
Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed
4 representatives for each group.  

 

User/Non-Contracted Party House - an equal number of commercial and
non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
representative.  The number of commercial and non-commercial
stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input from
these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8 representatives for
each group.  

 

Thanks.

 

Jon



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy