<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:31:15 +0200 (CEST)
Jon
BC disagrees with your attempt to determine the composition of the users
house. If we are to bracket let stay at 9 per group for users house as a
maximum - ie the existing commercial representation.
Philip
---------------------------
> I'd like to propose that we agree to the following language with regard
> to composition of the houses:
>
>
>
> Contracted Party House - an equal number of registry and registrar
> representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative. The number
> of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN
> Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed
> 4 representatives for each group.
>
>
>
> User/Non-Contracted Party House - an equal number of commercial and
> non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
> representative. The number of commercial and non-commercial
> stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input from
> these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8 representatives for
> each group.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|