<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
 
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:08:58 -0400
 
 
 
Fine with me.
 
Chuck
________________________________
        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
        Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:49 PM
        To: Avri Doria; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
        
        
        Per Avri's comments, I've amended below.  Thanks.  Jon
         
        Contracted Party House - an equal number of registry and
registrar representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative.
The number of registry and registrar stakeholders will be determined by
the ICANN Board based on input from these stakeholder groups, but shall
be no fewer than 3 and not exceed 4 representatives for each group.  
         
        User/Non-Contracted Party House - an equal number of commercial
and non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
representative.  The number of commercial and non-commercial
stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on input from
these stakeholder groups, but shall be no fewer than 5 and not exceed 8
representatives for each group.  
         
         
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
        Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:44 PM
        To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] House Composition
         
         
        Hi,
         
        does this mean the board could choose 2x4 for each house?  or
even  
        2x3 ...?
         
        a.
         
        On 24 Jul 2008, at 22:09, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
         
        > I'd like to propose that we agree to the following language
with  
        > regard to composition of the houses:
        > 
        > Contracted Party House - an equal number of registry and
registrar  
        > representatives and 1 Nominating Committee representative.
The  
        > number of registry and registrar stakeholders will be
determined by  
        > the ICANN Board based on input from these stakeholder groups,
but  
        > shall not exceed 4 representatives for each group.
        > 
        > User/Non-Contracted Party House - an equal number of
commercial and  
        > non-commercial user representatives and 1 Nominating Committee
        > representative.  The number of commercial and non-commercial  
        > stakeholders will be determined by the ICANN Board based on
input  
        > from these stakeholder groups, but shall not exceed 8  
        > representatives for each group.
        > 
        > Thanks.
        > 
        > Jon
         
         
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |