RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If we can resolve this by tomorrow, good.  But in my opinion if this
issue has to be resolved in the next 30 days or so, I do not see it as
that critical that I would be worred about it.  The biggest concern that
RyC members expressed on this issue yesterday is that the chair needs to
be well experienced with the GNSO Council.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:42 PM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO Consensus Current Thinking 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am assuming this chair is a non voting chair.
> 
> Or at least it is if it is held by the At-large NA (assuming 
> the notion of having that third NA finds favor with this group).
> 
> If someone from one of the houses was elected to the chair  would it  
> still be a non voting chair?    would that person be replaced in the  
> her/his house by a voting person?
> 
> would the default chair be allowed to be elected as the 
> chair, or can he/she only be a default chair if no one else 
> is choosable?
> 
> i know we never got t thinking much about how to elect a 
> chair in the bi-cameral model, but i started thinking through 
> how this proposal might work.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 24 Jul 2008, at 17:30, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> 
> > In fact, let me propose that the at-large NomCom rep serve as the 
> > non-voting chair unless there is a majority vote by both houses 
> > electing someone else.  That way we have a default Chair in 
> case there 
> > isn't majority support from both houses.  If there is a 
> Chair elected 
> > from one of the houses, then the at-large NomCom rep becomes a Vice 
> > Chair in lieu of the Vice Chair elected from that house.
> >
> > Essentially the leadership team will be one rep from each 
> house plus 
> > one at-large NomCom rep.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> 
>