ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold

  • To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold
  • From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:53:07 +0200 (CEST)

This has been discussed betwen Jon nevett and commercial users;copied here
for comment / support / revulsion.
Philip


BC supports as this complies with the no veto principle
Philip


>
> What about 75% of one House, simple majority of the other?  That way one
> contracted party could not block supermajority so long as the User House
> was strongly in support




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy