<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold
- From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:53:07 +0200 (CEST)
This has been discussed betwen Jon nevett and commercial users;copied here
for comment / support / revulsion.
Philip
BC supports as this complies with the no veto principle
Philip
>
> What about 75% of one House, simple majority of the other? That way one
> contracted party could not block supermajority so long as the User House
> was strongly in support
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|