RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am fine with this.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:53 AM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] supermajority policy threshold
> 
> 
> This has been discussed betwen Jon nevett and commercial 
> users;copied here for comment / support / revulsion.
> Philip
> 
> 
> BC supports as this complies with the no veto principle Philip
> 
> 
> >
> > What about 75% of one House, simple majority of the other?  
> That way 
> > one contracted party could not block supermajority so long 
> as the User 
> > House was strongly in support
> 
>