ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant

  • To: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:57:22 +0200


hi,

As i said, i am not on board with a proposal for only 2 nomcom appointees. and i am not sure how we will react to the addition of a homeless non voting nomcom appointee without a role - body count is one thing, but having a fully participatory voice is another. the requirement for full participation as required by the by-laws may be met in several ways, but i am afraid i just do not see it happening as things stand now.

We were still considering it until Phillip's statement showed up.

a.

On 25 Jul 2008, at 17:49, Milton L Mueller wrote:

Good to know you're on Board with the consensus statement, Avri.
Presumably Alan is, too? So, can we add a principle on the
user/registrant distinction in the short time remaining to us?

-----Original Message-----

Gee, i thought people were still trying to reach consensus.






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy