<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC
- From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:10:26 -0400
Chuck, the plan is for both commercial and noncommercial SGs to include
individuals, at least that was part of the Joint Users Proposal
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gomes, Chuck
[Gomes, Chuck] Saying "the composition of this house
includes all interested parties " seems to imply that individuals could
directly become members of the house. It might be better to say
something like this: "This house would be made up of groups representing
all interested parties".
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|