RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I understand that.  I am probably being too picky.  The house will be
made up of representatives from two stakeholder groups each of which
could have various group (constituency) members.  The groups within an
SG would be open to all interested parties but the house would not be
made up of all interested parties.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@xxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:10 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; Alan Greenberg; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group
Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC
        
        


        Chuck, the plan is for both commercial and noncommercial SGs to
include individuals, at least that was part of the Joint Users Proposal
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gomes,
Chuck
                        [Gomes, Chuck] Saying  "the composition of this
house
        includes all interested parties " seems to imply that
individuals could
        directly become members of the house.  It might be better to say
        something like this: "This house would be made up of groups
representing
        all interested parties".