RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

All of this could be avoided by keeping it a GNSO drafting team or wg as
I proposed.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI
> Working Group
> From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, July 14, 2011 10:42 pm
> To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>,        Margie
> Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I&#39;m OK  with Steve&#39;s  proposed wording  but you should hear from ALAC 
> Chair  rest of ExCom et.al. to see if they agree with me ;-) 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
> 
> 
> 
> On 15 July 2011 12:52, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks, Rosemary.  I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify that 
> each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way.  Some may endorse, others 
> may comment or modify before sending to the board, and some might reject it.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> 
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their 
> consideration.  
> The Working Group Report would, if approved by the respective SO/ACs, would 
> then be forwarded to the Board as the �Advice� in response to the Board 
> Resolution 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Proposed Alternative:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their 
> consideration.   The Working Group Report would be considered by GNSO, ccNSO,
>  and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as �Advice� responsive to the 
> Board Resolution.   Each AC/SO may act independently on the Working Group 
> Report, and may endorse all, part, or none of the report recommendations.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org 
> +1.202.420.7482 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> 
> I&#39;ve suggested one small amendment in the doc
> 
> 
> the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board has 
> asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a WG...
> 
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> I&#39;m also looking for a seconder for the motion...
> 
> 
> On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and ALAC 
> liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups (as Board 
> has asked all of us for advice....)
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> Rosemary
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam 
> [Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
> 
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
> 
> 
> Dear All-
> 
> 
> Per Rosemary�s request, please find a draft charter for your review and 
> consideration.   The attached document uses the new template that Staff has 
> recently developed based on the GNSO Council�s Working Group Guidelines.
> 
> 
> 
> All the Best,
> 
> 
> Margie
> _______
> 
> 
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>