Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>]

Hello Steve,

with both Cheryl & Evan, my Vice-Chairs in approval, and thanks to prior
informal discussion with other ALAC members, re: those matters, I'm
happy with your proposed alternative which removes ambiguities and makes
sure that no SO/AC would be able to block transmittal to the Board by
the other SO/ACs.
Thumbs up from me.
Kind regards,

Olivier

On 15/07/2011 03:52, Steve DelBianco wrote :
> Thanks, Rosemary.  I believe the Objective should be amended to
> clarify that each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way.  Some
> may endorse, others may comment or modify before sending to the board,
> and some might reject it.  
>
> You wrote:
>
>     To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the
>     AC/SOs for their consideration.   The Working Group Report would,
>     if approved by the respective SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to
>     the Board as the “Advice” in response to the Board Resolution 
>
>
> Proposed Alternative:
>
>
>     To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the
>     AC/SOs for their consideration.   The Working Group Report would
>     be considered by GNSO, ccNSO, and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN
>     Board as “Advice” responsive to the Board Resolution.   Each AC/SO
>     may act independently on the Working Group Report, and may endorse
>     all, part, or none of the report recommendations.
>
>
> -- 
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
> +1.202.420.7482
>
>
> On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've suggested one small amendment in the doc
>
> the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the
> Board has asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO
> approves a WG...
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...
>
> On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and
> ALAC liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups
> (as Board has asked all of us for advice....)
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> [owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Margie
> Milam [Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
> Dear All-
>
> Per Rosemary’s request, please find a draft charter for your review
> and consideration.   The attached document uses the new template that
> Staff has recently developed based on the GNSO Council’s Working Group
> Guidelines.
>
> All the Best,
>
> Margie
> _______
>
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______
>
>
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html