<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
- To: <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ocl@xxxxxxx>, <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
- From: carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:45:37 +0000
I endorse the motion with amendment made by Steve and ratified by ALAC chair. I
second it
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org
> From: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: ocl@xxxxxxx; sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:18:12 +1000
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
>
> Thanks all,
>
> I'm now looking for a seconder for the Motion among Council Members
>
> NCSG will be discussing early next week ahead of Council but other offers
> welcome!!
>
> I will proposed the amendment below as the first step...
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
> ________________________________________
> From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [ocl@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 12:26 AM
> To: Steve DelBianco
> Cc: Rosemary Sinclair; Margie Milam; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> with both Cheryl & Evan, my Vice-Chairs in approval, and thanks to prior
> informal discussion with other ALAC members, re: those matters, I'm happy
> with your proposed alternative which removes ambiguities and makes sure that
> no SO/AC would be able to block transmittal to the Board by the other SO/ACs.
> Thumbs up from me.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 15/07/2011 03:52, Steve DelBianco wrote :
> Thanks, Rosemary. I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify that
> each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way. Some may endorse, others
> may comment or modify before sending to the board, and some might reject it.
>
> You wrote:
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their
> consideration. The Working Group Report would, if approved by the
> respective SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to the Board as the “Advice” in
> response to the Board Resolution
>
> Proposed Alternative:
>
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their
> consideration. The Working Group Report would be considered by GNSO, ccNSO,
> and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as “Advice” responsive to the
> Board Resolution. Each AC/SO may act independently on the Working Group
> Report, and may endorse all, part, or none of the report recommendations.
>
> --
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
> +1.202.420.7482
>
>
> On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair"
> <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've suggested one small amendment in the doc
>
> the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board has
> asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a WG...
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...
>
> On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and ALAC
> liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups (as Board
> has asked all of us for advice....)
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From:
> owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> [owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>]
> On Behalf Of Margie Milam
> [Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
> Dear All-
>
> Per Rosemary’s request, please find a draft charter for your review and
> consideration. The attached document uses the new template that Staff has
> recently developed based on the GNSO Council’s Working Group Guidelines.
>
> All the Best,
>
> Margie
> _______
>
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|