<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Definitions
- To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Salazar <michael.salazar@xxxxxxxxx>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Definitions
- From: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 05:37:17 +1000
Hi All
I'm comfortable with this..."and applicable national laws"
Cheers
Rosemary
________________________________________
From: Steve DelBianco [sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:54 AM
To: Michael Salazar; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Rosemary Sinclair; Margie Milam
Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Definitions
Just a follow-up on discussions from last week's call, regarding reference to
"national laws" in the definition of Consumer Trust.
I initially proposed this definition:
Consumer Trust is the degree of confidence among registrants and users that a
TLD registry operator is fulfilling its proposed purpose and is complying with
ICANN policies and all relevant national laws.
Michael and others suggested removing "all" before "relevant". That makes
sense, and perhaps we should say "applicable" instead of "relevant", given
some of the citations I found in ICANN documents for "national laws":
1. Articles of Incorporation: “The Corporation shall operate for the
benefit of the Internet community as a whole, carrying out its activities in
conformity with relevant principles of international law and applicable
international conventions and local law"
2. Applicant Guidebook: “National Law” is cited as potential basis for
Government objections, GAC Early Warning, and/or GAC advice
3. Affirmation of Commitments: “9.3.1 ICANN additionally commits to
enforcing its existing policy relating to WHOIS, subject to applicable laws”
4. Bylaws: regarding ccTLDs: “provided that such policies do not conflict
with the law applicable to the ccTLD manager”
I realize that some in our WG do not want to cite national laws at all. I did
the above research to support my belief that we should cite national laws as a
nod to governments and the GAC. This was before we saw the European
Commission working papers, which also cite the importance of national laws
(attached). However flawed the EC papers may be, they indicate the political
lens through which the new gTLD program will be judged by governments.
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|