<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] LAST CALL: hopefully the final version of our Draft Advice
- To: "'Consumer CCI DT'" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] LAST CALL: hopefully the final version of our Draft Advice
- From: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:07:23 -0700
Team,
I omitted one word on my edits. 30 Lashes to me.
On page 6, the revision should read:
The Working Group RECOMMENDS that the ICANN Board direct staff to identify
baseline values for any measure that applies to the pre-expansion gTLD
space, so that future targets can be stated in terms of improvements
relative to present performance.
Thank you. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 17:32
To: 'Consumer CCI DT'
Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] LAST CALL: hopefully the final version of
our Draft Advice
Team,
Here are a few proposed changes to the Advice Letter. Please let me know if
you find these acceptable.
Thank you. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 09:08
To: Consumer CCI DT
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] LAST CALL: hopefully the final version of our
Draft Advice
Here's v6, reflecting discussions on our 14-Feb working group call.
21-Feb is our last call before ICANN posts this draft advice for community
review and comment. So please REPLY ALL with your last round of edit
suggestions -- before next Tuesday.
You'll see our changes to Consumer Choice measures, plus a row I added for
IDN and non-English choices at Registrars - not just at Registries.
We made multiple changes to measures for Competition, including the
controversial step of suggesting targets for "defensive registrations" and
"new entrants". Let's consider these carefully.
And I added appendix B to show the note from ICANN legal department on
collecting prices. Below that note, I added this:
Note: While this legal concern is appreciated, the Working Group notes that
none of the measures suggested in this draft advice document would require
ICANN to issue any recommendations for how registrars and registries price
their domain names.
Regards,
Steve
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|