RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Vinay,

I think the PDP WG should consult the ICANN legal team over issues such as what 
constitutes a legal address - is that the example you meant? (It's on p.13.) I 
also think they need to decide how that is going to work. I'm slightly 
reluctant to tread on their toes.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of vinay kumar singh
Sent: 22 August 2013 13:01
To: Dillon, Chris; Julie Hedlund
Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Rudi Vansnick
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft 
PDP WG Charter

Dear Chris,

Greetings of the day!!!

As discussed in the previous meeting regarding the "Legal Issues"- raised by 
Rudi, the conclusion we arrived was, we may get legal advice from lCANN legal 
team. But I think we need to discuss in elaborate the mechanism that could be 
worked on to address the legal issues by PDP team.

For further details regarding the legal implications that would arise during 
the Translation and Transliteration process :
Refer paragraph 4 on page number 16 of the document:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/ird/final-report-ird-wg-07may12-en.pdf

Regards,
Vinay Kumar Singh
Student: LL.B. with Honors in Intellectual Property
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
India
Mobile: +91 8509 227 666
________________________________
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft 
PDP WG Charter
From: rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:36:18 +0200
CC: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
To: c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx

Dear Chris,

As you said the document drafted by Julie is great and is not easy to improve. 
All is covered as far as I understand the principles of the duty of the draft 
team. It is up to the WG to elaborate responses to the given questions and 
issues. I would let the WG decide if they want to extend the 5 present models. 
It would require some investigation for us to define a sixth model, that 
perhaps was already discussed previously and was not withhold.

Interesting sample question ... a lot to discuss but isn't that the duty of the 
WG ? We are only the charter drafting team ...

Till later today.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair NPOC Policy Committee - ICANN  - www.npoc.org<http://www.npoc.org/>

Mobile +32/(0)475/28.16.32 - Tel +32/(0)9/329.39.16
rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>


Op 22-aug.-2013, om 09:12 heeft "Dillon, Chris" 
<c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> het volgende geschreven:

Dear colleagues,

Julie's drafting is difficult to improve.
However, I wonder if it would be good to have a line explicitly indicating that 
the PDP WG will be free to modify the five alternatives in Section II, 
effectively creating a sixth one which is recommended/preferred.

Beyond that my mind is starting to think about translation/transliteration 
principles for the representation of contact details (rather than notes for so 
many languages), but that is probably best left to the PDP WG. An example of a 
principle might be the answer to the question "What happens if there is more 
than one Romanization (transliteration) for a language in common use?".

Looking forward to speaking later,

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 
31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: 
owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 21 August 2013 20:05
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG 
Charter
Importance: High

Dear members of the Charter Drafting Team,

This is a reminder that per our actions from our meeting that week, attached 
you will find a revised draft charter for your review and for discussion at our 
next meeting on Thursday, 22 August  1500 UTC (08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 
London, 17:00 CEST).  The changes are reflected as redlines.  This also is 
posted on wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/22+August+2013.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director