[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Julie,

That's no trouble at all. I was just trying to keep things moving. I'll present 
the documents to him on Friday and ask about the liaison role.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 17 September 2013 15:16
To: Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion

Dear Chris,

I should have explained before, but the motion needs to be put forth to the 
Council by a Councillor.  Once the DT accepts the motion and the Charter 
(deadline this Wednesday) I was going to suggest that perhaps that you could 
present the documents to Ching Chao (who is a Councillor) on behalf of the DT 
and ask if he would be willing to submit the motion.

Also, the DT does not have a GNSO Council Liaison and none has been selected 
yet for the PDP-WG, although as noted in the motion this person can be 
designated later.  The Liaison also must be a Councilor.  II apologize for not 
explaining this on our last call.

Best regards,

Julie

From: <Dillon>, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:05 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion

Dear Julie,

I have nothing substantial to add to either document, perhaps with the 
exception that I would like to be one of those proposing the motion.

I'm guessing you may be the GNSO Council Liaison?

I'm also sending this to encourage any last minute discussion of the documents, 
which could be substantial as we still have a last meeting scheduled on 
Thursday. Moreover, we do need another sponsor.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: 
owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 16 September 2013 19:47
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion
Importance: High

Dear Charter Drafting Team members,

After reviewing the motion again, I realized that I left out an important 
whereas clause.  This clause was missing from the motion I used as an example 
because the charter in that case was provided by staff and not by a drafting 
team. Also, rather than inserting the key issues from the charter into the 
motion it seems more complete to reference a link to the full charter.  The 
link will be inserted once the motion once a Councillor agrees to sponsor it.

Please see the attached version where these changes are tracked for your 
consideration.

Best regards,

Julie

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:35 PM
To: 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW: Charter and Motion

Dear Charter Drafting Team members,

As discussed today, attached for your review is the charter and motion.  In the 
charter document I have accepted all of the changes.  The motion will be 
submitted along with the final charter to the Council for consideration at its 
meeting on 10 October.  An example of a similar motion for your reference may 
be found here: 
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+-+17+January+2013
 (Motion for Approval of a Charter for the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy 
(IRTP) Part D Working Group (WG)).

**Deadline:  Please submit to the list any questions, comments, or edits to 
either of these documents by COB Wednesday, 18 September.**

Note also that we currently have a call scheduled on 19 September, but unless 
there are changes that need to be discussed in a call (rather than on the list) 
we will probably cancel the call.  However, we will wait until the 
above-mentioned deadline before we decide to cancel.

Next steps after Council approval:  Once the charter is approved staff will 
send out a broad invitation for the PDP Working Group.  You will note in the 
motion that there is a deadline for the PDP WG to be formed within 14 days of 
approval of the charter.  Of course all Charter DT members are encouraged to 
join the PDP WG.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support