Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion
Dear Chris, Many thanks for moving forward with the motion. I'm sure Ching Chao will accept to pass the motion. And Julie, also thanks a lot for your help and assistance. As this was my first drafting team work, I'm now confident I can be more effective in the next one. And yes, I'm looking forward joining the working group for this PDP. Kind regards, Rudi Vansnick NPOC chair Policy Committee NPOC treasurer rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 www.npoc.org Op 17-sep.-2013, om 16:26 heeft "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx> het volgende geschreven: > Dear Julie, > > That’s no trouble at all. I was just trying to keep things moving. I’ll > present the documents to him on Friday and ask about the liaison role. > > Regards, > > Chris. > -- > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, > Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) > ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 17 September 2013 15:16 > To: Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion > > Dear Chris, > > I should have explained before, but the motion needs to be put forth to the > Council by a Councillor. Once the DT accepts the motion and the Charter > (deadline this Wednesday) I was going to suggest that perhaps that you could > present the documents to Ching Chao (who is a Councillor) on behalf of the DT > and ask if he would be willing to submit the motion. > > Also, the DT does not have a GNSO Council Liaison and none has been selected > yet for the PDP-WG, although as noted in the motion this person can be > designated later. The Liaison also must be a Councilor. II apologize for > not explaining this on our last call. > > Best regards, > > Julie > > From: <Dillon>, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:05 AM > To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, > "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion > > Dear Julie, > > I have nothing substantial to add to either document, perhaps with the > exception that I would like to be one of those proposing the motion. > > I’m guessing you may be the GNSO Council Liaison? > > I’m also sending this to encourage any last minute discussion of the > documents, which could be substantial as we still have a last meeting > scheduled on Thursday. Moreover, we do need another sponsor. > > Regards, > > Chris. > -- > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, > Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) > ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund > Sent: 16 September 2013 19:47 > To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Charter and REVISED Motion > Importance: High > > Dear Charter Drafting Team members, > > After reviewing the motion again, I realized that I left out an important > whereas clause. This clause was missing from the motion I used as an example > because the charter in that case was provided by staff and not by a drafting > team. Also, rather than inserting the key issues from the charter into the > motion it seems more complete to reference a link to the full charter. The > link will be inserted once the motion once a Councillor agrees to sponsor it. > > Please see the attached version where these changes are tracked for your > consideration. > > Best regards, > > Julie > > From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:35 PM > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW: Charter and Motion > > Dear Charter Drafting Team members, > > As discussed today, attached for your review is the charter and motion. In > the charter document I have accepted all of the changes. The motion will be > submitted along with the final charter to the Council for consideration at > its meeting on 10 October. An example of a similar motion for your reference > may be found here: > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+-+17+January+2013 > (Motion for Approval of a Charter for the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy > (IRTP) Part D Working Group (WG)). > > **Deadline: Please submit to the list any questions, comments, or edits to > either of these documents by COB Wednesday, 18 September.** > > Note also that we currently have a call scheduled on 19 September, but unless > there are changes that need to be discussed in a call (rather than on the > list) we will probably cancel the call. However, we will wait until the > above-mentioned deadline before we decide to cancel. > > Next steps after Council approval: Once the charter is approved staff will > send out a broad invitation for the PDP Working Group. You will note in the > motion that there is a deadline for the PDP WG to be formed within 14 days of > approval of the charter. Of course all Charter DT members are encouraged to > join the PDP WG. > > Best regards, > > Julie > > Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support Attachment:
signature.asc
|