RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter

[vinay kumar singh <vinaysingh85@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Chris,

Thanks, this seems fine with the explanantion.

Regards,
Vinay

From: c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx
To: vinaysingh85@xxxxxxxxxxx; lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx; 
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
CC: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:11:58 +0000









Dear Vinay,
 
Thank you for that.
 
The reason for my change in the 3rd point is the possibility that the WG could 
stipulate something not covered by the 2013 RAA. If the WG
 were to do that, the key issue would be when the WG’s decision would come into 
effect, as it would not be possible to have two contradictory policy statements 
at the same time. The when question is possibly better in addition to, rather 
than instead of the
 3rd point.
 
Regards,
 
Chris.

--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

 


From: vinay kumar singh [mailto:vinaysingh85@xxxxxxxxxxx]


Sent: 01 November 2013 17:12

To: Dillon, Chris; Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx

Cc: Volker Greimann

Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter


 

Dear Chris,



I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you 
is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the 
original, please check.



Regards,

Vinay




From:
c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx

To: lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx; 
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx

CC: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter

Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000

Dear all,
 
I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4:
 
I think the second one should be split into two questions:
Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all 
gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries?
 ->
Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? 
Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain
 countries?
 
Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like “When 
should the WG’s recommendations come into effect?”?
Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on 
the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA?
 
Regards,
 
Chris.

--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

 


From:
owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann

Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52

To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx

Cc: Volker Greimann

Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter


 

Dear all,


Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined 
additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days 
ago (see
 pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your 
thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's 
call.


Many thanks and best wishes,


Lars