[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting - 20 November 2014
Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 20 November at 14:00 UTC at: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141120-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141120-en.mp3 On page: <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Jennifer Chung – RySG Chris Dillon – NCSG Rudi Vansnick – NPOC Ubolthip Sethakaset – Individual Peter Green (Zhang Zuan)-NCUC Jim Galvin - RySG Justine Chew – Individual Apologies: Petter Rindforth – IPC Amr Elsadr – NCUC Emily Taylor – RrSG Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP ICANN staff: Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: <http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx> http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 20 November 2014: Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG call on 20 November 2014 Chris Dillon:Hello everyone Chris Dillon:https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/20+November+2014 Chris Dillon:https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/Comments+on+Initial+report+on+the+Translation+and+Transliteration+of+Contact+Information+Policy+Development+Process Rudi Vansnick:are there standards of transformation we could lean on ? Peter Green （CONAC）:@Rudi, it is really difficult to have such standards Chris Dillon:Pinyin is certainly complex. Peter Green （CONAC）:Yes, Pinyin is an example, but generally, language diversity and accuracy is the main challenge to have such standards Justine Chew:No I don't think it's just you Jim. Rudi Vansnick:i would suggest not limiting to 1 (one) Justine Chew:I don't see how the existing content can continue in the current form if we were to proceed with non-mandatory approach. Chris Dillon:The arguments stay in the document. Justine Chew:So you're saying let's present arguments for both approaches and based on these conclude that only 1 set of recommendations be put forth? Chris Dillon:Yes. Jennifer Chung:Thanks for the clarification Chris and Jim Rudi Vansnick:the minus could be abstention ! Julie Hedlund:My apologies everyone, but I have to drop off the call to go to another meeting. Julie Hedlund:Have a great day! Chris Dillon:Bye Rudi Vansnick:thanks Chris for the great work (also to Lars) Jennifer Chung:I will have to send in my apologies for next Thursday because of Thanksgiving Rudi Vansnick:start now with a blank one Justine Chew:I see the position Chris is faced with because we still need to refer to existing provided comments. Jennifer Chung:Thanks all, bye. Attachment:
smime.p7s |