Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus

[Peter Dernbach <pdernbach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Chris, Rudi, Lars and All,

Unfortunately, I have a conflict that prevents me from joining today's call.

Best regards,
Peter


 <http://www.winklerpartners.com/>

  Peter J.Dernbach
譚璧德


Partner
合夥律師(外國法事務律師)
   *T* 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222
*F* 886 (0)2 2311 2688   www.winklerpartners.com
pdernbach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------

NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and
privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute
the contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender.

本電子郵件及其附件含有私有、機密、依法受特別保護之資料，僅供意定之收件人使用。若您並非所意定之收件人，即不得予以使用、重製或散布，並請刪除其內容，並通知寄件人。

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Dear Justine and colleagues,
>
>
>
> I should have mentioned earlier, as Lars email’d, please raise any request
> for deadline extension as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> Justine - Many thanks for your painstaking proofreading. I am happy to
> adopt all your edits with the one exception of “losslessly” which is
> supposed to mean “without loss (of information etc.)”, not “loosely”. There
> will be one last version with proofreading edits made.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Chris.
>
> --
>
> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities,
> UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
> www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
>
>
>
> *From:* Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* 10 June 2015 16:19
> *To:* Rudi Vansnick; Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Lars Hoffmann
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for
> consensus
>
>
>
> Dear Chris, Rudi,
>
>
> I am re-reading Final Report T&T.docx and while in my opinion, everything
> is substantially in order, there are some formatting issues and spelling
> errors for your attention:
>
>
>
> 1. Table of Contents - section 6. Community Input has renumbered itself to
> 1. and so forth.
>
> 2. Chapter 1.1 Background - the open inverted comma that appears towards
> the end of the 4th line is missing is close counterpart. This perhaps
> should appear at the end of Chapter 1.1, ie. end of the 2nd bullet?
>
> 3. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #3 on pg 4 - is reference to 'ccTLD' meant
> to be included considering that our mission and scope only pertains to
> contact information with respect to gTLDs? Where else is 'ccTLD' mentioned
> except as a supporting example on pg 16? I thought our debate centered
> purely on gLTDs.
>
>
>
> 4. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #4 on pg 4 - 'policies' on the 4th line is
> mis-spelt. Also the 2nd sentence on the 4th line seems to be 'hanging',
> perhaps prefix it with "It is also assured that ....."?
>
> 5. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #6 on pg 4 - the part of the sentence
> beginning on the 3rd line reads funny. May I suggest it be reworded to read
> as "... and its linguistic/script capacity expanded for receiving, ......"?
>
> 6. Chapter 1.3 Last paragraph on pg 4 - should be '... the question of who
> should decide who should bear ....' i.e the words 'of who' have been
> omitted.
>
>
>
> 7. Chapter 1.4 - I know that the Working Group has been abbreviated to
> (WG) in para 1.2 but I think no where else is the abbreviation of WG used
> in this document except for in chapter 1.4 - so can I please be pedantic
> and ask that the 2 references to 'WG' - one in each paragraph - be amended
> to 'Working Group'?
>
> 8. Chapter 3 - suffers the same issue as in Chapter 1.1 i.e. missing
> closing inverted comma in 1st para.
>
> 9. Chapter 4 on pg 9 2nd para - to remove the word 'some' on the 4th line.
>
> 10. End of Chapter 5.1.2 on pg 17 - perhaps add the words 'although the
> Working Group did not come to a conclusion as to who should decide who
> should bear the said burden.' to properly address our non-answering of
> Charter Q2.
>
> 11. Chapter 5.1.3 on pg 17 - the word 'borne' is mis-spelt; appears twice
> in the 2nd paragraph.
>
> 12. Chapter 5.2.1 on pg 18 para 1 - 'losslessly'? You mean 'loosely'?
>
>
> 13. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #3 on pg 19 - see point 3 above, take out
> reference to 'ccTLD'?
>
> 14. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #4 on pg 19 - see point 4 above,
> 'policies' is mis-spelt.
>
> 15. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation $6 on top of pg 20 - see point 5 above.
>
> 16. End of Chapter 5.2.2 re Charter Q2 - see point 6 above.
>
> I take it that the rest of the document contains text copied from a
> reliable source. Also that Annex B is the same copy that was finalised
> before.
>
>
> Once again, I thank you for your hard work and dedication in leading the
> WG to this Final Report.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Justine Chew
> -----
>
>
>
> On 10 June 2015 at 20:56, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Dear working group members,
>
>
>
> As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris
> Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions:
>
> 1.       All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG
> and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to
> by members of the Working Group.
>
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated
> on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with
> a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC.
>
> 3.       Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full
> consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions,
> noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial
> Report that was published for public comment in December 2015.
>
>
>
> All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015
> to object to the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone
> objects, please explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted
> time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council
> for their action along with a draft motion for its approval.
>
>
>
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rudi Vansnick
>
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
>
> www.npoc.org
>
>
>
> rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx
>
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>