<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
- To: "Lars Hoffmann" <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
- From: 张钻 <zhangzuan@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 07:42:43 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Hi Lars, Hi everyone,
I agree to immediately make this IMPORTANT change.
Thank you.
Best
Zhang Zuan / Peter Green
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Lars Hoffmann" <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间:2015-06-21 03:10:29 (星期日)
收件人: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
抄送:
主题: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY
NEEDED!
Dear all,
Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible.
It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used
in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report
The Recommendation reads currently:
Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the
language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent
to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy,
Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices.
Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the
aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be
easily identifiable.
Level of consensus: Full Consensus
The term ‘verified’ in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal
implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the
Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular
issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of
“verification”. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the
Group meant to use the term ‘validate’ not ‘verifiy’ and it should be changed
accordingly.
With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual
meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the
GNSO Council’s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as
possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for
Wednesday’s Council discussion and vote.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars
--
政务和公益机构域名注册管理中心(中央编办事业发展中心)
国际部 张钻
电 话:010-6900 1156
Email:zhangzuan@xxxxxxxx
网 址:http://www.conac.cn
地 址:北京市海淀区学院南路15号院6号楼北发大厦417室
邮 编:100088
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|