ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: Issues list

  • To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: Issues list
  • From: "Balleste, Roy" <rballeste@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:31:37 +0000


Thank you!  The list looks very good!


From: owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
[owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Don Blumenthal 
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:46 PM
To: gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Issues list

We need to have a preliminary ready for the WG by the Beijing meeting. The 
Wednesday call spent some time reviewing a preliminary list of issues to cover. 
The list after comments during the the call is attached.

Please let me know if you have any questions about the items, think that some 
should come off, or have additional points that we should cover,

I hope to have a draft done by Monday. As an sneak preview, the general 
approach will be:

The WG task is to examine thick and thin registry models and decide if ICANN 
should mandate a thick model for existing thin registries and for registries 
created in any additional rounds of new gTLD solicitations.
Thin models exist
Thick models exist
What indicates that data privacy and protection issues are different for thick 
vs thin?
What DPP issues might arise in the transition of existing thin registries to 
thick setups?

Comments on that approach are welcome, although I'm sure that I'll see them 
regardless after I share the draft. :)


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy