Re: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Issues list

[Marie Laure Lemineur <mllemineur@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Don. I'll only  be able to review it over the week end. 

Best, 
Marie-laure

Enviado desde mi iPhone.
Favor disculpar errores ortográficos.

Sent from my IPhone.
Please excuse any spelling errors. 

El 29/03/2013, a las 11:46, Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx> escribió:

> We need to have a preliminary ready for the WG by the Beijing meeting. The 
> Wednesday call spent some time reviewing a preliminary list of issues to 
> cover. The list after comments during the the call is attached.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions about the items, think that some 
> should come off, or have additional points that we should cover,
> 
> I hope to have a draft done by Monday. As an sneak preview, the general 
> approach will be:
> 
> The WG task is to examine thick and thin registry models and decide if ICANN 
> should mandate a thick model for existing thin registries and for registries 
> created in any additional rounds of new gTLD solicitations.
> Thin models exist
> Thick models exist
> What indicates that data privacy and protection issues are different for 
> thick vs thin?
> What DPP issues might arise in the transition of existing thin registries to 
> thick setups?
> 
> Comments on that approach are welcome, although I'm sure that I'll see them 
> regardless after I share the draft. :)
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> 
> <DPP Report Issues.docx>