ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

FW: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Today's draft

  • To: "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: FW: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Today's draft
  • From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:34:44 -0400

This note from Monday night just showed up in my inbox. Same for everyone
else? Note: it did have the file but I figured that you didn't need
another copy.

If so, sorry. I have no clue what happened.

On 4/24/13 6:27 AM, "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>Here it is. I think I covered all of the points made in last week's
>conversation but I would appreciate some clarification:
>I remember saying that Port 43 requirements might be eliminated in the
>draft RAA but can't recall how the subject came up.
>Please help me flesh out how these two points, as I noted them, fit in
>1) VRSN ­ registrants have agreed. Registrars no longer authoritative
>2) Direct consumer contact. Ry has to depend on Rr
>Mikey stressed in a couple of notes today that it's important to send
>this memo for today's meeting. I'll hold until 8:30 EDT, and might even
>have my own rewrites if I can look at the new RAA. Let me know if you
>have comments by then. If it's too late, we will have opportunities to
>weak later.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy