<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
FW: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Today's draft
- To: "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: FW: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Today's draft
- From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:34:44 -0400
This note from Monday night just showed up in my inbox. Same for everyone
else? Note: it did have the file but I figured that you didn't need
another copy.
If so, sorry. I have no clue what happened.
On 4/24/13 6:27 AM, "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Here it is. I think I covered all of the points made in last week's
>conversation but I would appreciate some clarification:
>
>I remember saying that Port 43 requirements might be eliminated in the
>draft RAA but can't recall how the subject came up.
>
>Please help me flesh out how these two points, as I noted them, fit in
>1) VRSN registrants have agreed. Registrars no longer authoritative
>2) Direct consumer contact. Ry has to depend on Rr
>
>Mikey stressed in a couple of notes today that it's important to send
>this memo for today's meeting. I'll hold until 8:30 EDT, and might even
>have my own rewrites if I can look at the new RAA. Let me know if you
>have comments by then. If it's too late, we will have opportunities to
>weak later.
>
>Don
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|