ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Addition to Privacy summary

  • To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx WHOIS" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Addition to Privacy summary
  • From: "Balleste, Roy" <rballeste@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 16:44:34 +0000

Thank you Susan!!  I agree with Amr statement.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:47 PM
To: gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx WHOIS
Subject: Re: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] 
Addition to Privacy summary

Hi Susan,

On May 14, 2013, at 6:31 PM, "Prosser, Susan" <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Amr, to your point, I believe the draft addresses the greater issue of data 
> protection. The Conclusion section, under Data Protection Laws, it draws the 
> point that Thick Whois models are in existence, rightly or wrongly.  To 
> address the issue of data protection, we advise ICANN to explore the issue in 
> more detail.  It is not discounting there is a concern.  But, that it must be 
> addressed by ICANN.  That is how I interpret the document.  

I agree 100%. I interpret the document in pretty much the same way. I'm pretty 
happy with how thoroughly the draft statement illustrates these issues in as 
much detail as we have discussed over the past few months. I really appreciate 
how effectively Don managed to capture all of our deliberations so clearly, in 
addition to some very substantive edits made by Steve and others.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy