RE: [gnso-dow123] Agenda for Tomorrow

["Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>]

I've gone though it quickly, I didn't notice the staff report (the one
regarding the "low hanging fruit") as being included.  Can someone point
me to where it is in the document?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:31 AM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Agenda for Tomorrow

Hi Marilyn:

I hope you have received the report at this point.  We will have a call 
today to discuss the report, although we may still need to make some 
revisions to ensure that it has all of the appropriate information for 
publication for public comment.

It does look like Maria has done a helpful job of summarizing the 
rather circuitous history of the work up until this point, which will 
be quite helpful to readers new to the process.

Jordyn


On Mar 28, 2005, at 11:02 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> Sorry, WHAT report? I haven't received a distribution with the report
> attached. Can it be sent separately, Maria, to me? Perhaps my spam 
> filter
> blocked it...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]

> On
> Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:58 PM
> To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Agenda for Tomorrow
>
> On 3/28/2005 7:35 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that:
>> Ross:
>>
>> The original intent was to discuss the report with an eye towards
>> completing the requirements of the PDP for the creation of a
>> "preliminary report", which we spent some time discussing on the last
>> call.  (Unfortunately, I'm in e-mail only mode right now, so I can't
>> pull up the relevant language, but there is a requirement for a 
>> meeting
>> within 5 days of the publication of the preliminary report in order
to
>> try to resolve any substantive disagreements or something like that.)
>>
>> However, as we've not yet seen the report and we're less than 24
hours
>> away from the meeting, I'm somewhat inclined to take Milton's advice 
>> and
>> defer the meeting.  However, that leaves us in a bit of a bind as I'm
>> fairly confident that Maria will succeed in
>> "publishing" the report in the near future, and it will be difficult 
>> to
>> schedule a formal meeting of the TF until the week after next, given
>> that many of us will be traveling to Mar Del Plata (and some of us
>> won't, as well).  To that end, we'd probably need to advise the 
>> council
>> of another deviation from the PDP, but that we would expect to make 
>> the
>> report available for its public comment period shortly after Mar Del
> Plata.
>
> Thanks for the background Jordyn - very helpful. I've started to
browse
> through the report with these goals in mind, but would certainly
> appreciate some further opportunity to give the document a full read.
> There is a lot to consider here and I'm not sure that we could do
> Maria's work justice on such short notice. However, as Maria suggests,

> a
> review of the highlights of the document would be very helpful.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
>
>       -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
> indispensable condition for social progress."
>       - Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)