<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] DRAFT redline of recommendation 2
- To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] DRAFT redline of recommendation 2
- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:02:28 -0400
Dr. Milton Mueller
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://www.digital-convergence.org
http://www.internetgovernance.org
>>> "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 4/26/2005 12:53:50 PM
>>>
>John Jeffrey: Well as a starting point ICANNs registrar accreditation
>agreement already provides that a registrar shall abide by applicable
laws
>and government regulations.
Bret: the issue if what happens if compliance with those local laws is
inconsistent with the Whois requirements? There is strong pressure on
ICANN to de-accredit in that case.
>the obligations in the agreement, then we believe that the registrar
would
>of course have to comply with that law. There are a number of steps
that
>ICANN could take relating to that. I think some of these questions go
to
>the very answers that you're trying to supply. So I guess is the
question
In other words, Jeffries himself recognizes that we need an exceptions
procedure.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|