[Fwd: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation]

["GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Forwarded from Steve Metalitz who is unable to post while on vacation.

(1) Pending an explanation of the merits of the objection, IPC opposes
sending the note Jordyn drafted

(2) Since the constituency Ross and Paul represent voted against the
recommendation origiinally, what is the basis for reconsideration?
Normally such a motion could only be brought by someone who had voted
yes originally
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----
From: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Ryan Lehning <rlehning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steven J. Metalitz IIPA
<metalitz@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed Aug 10 11:45:18 2005
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation

Ryan,
Thank yo very much for this response which I have posted to the list.
Only task force members subscribed to the list can post, the reason why
your posting failed.
  Steve,
 >(On a housekeeping note, maybe there is a problem with our list since I
 >did not receive Jordyn's original message nor any call-in notice for
 >Tuesday's call. Was one sent?)
  Notice of the Whois task force call on 9 August did go to you via the
Conference message system. The list seems to be in order so I am not
sure why you did not receive Jordyn's original message.
Sorry about this!
Kind regards,
Glen


Ryan Lehning wrote:
 > Glen,
 >
 > Steve Metalitz is out this week, but checking email and would like to
 > make the following post in response to Ross Rader's post, to the Whois
 > TF 123 list, but cannot do so remotely.  I attempted to do so for him
 > earlier today but it appears the post hasn't shown up yet.  Can you make
 > this posting for Steve to the list?
 >
 > Thanks and let me know if you have questions.
 >
 > Ryan Lehning
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Steve Metalitz
 > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:32 AM
 > To: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx; Jordyn A. Buchanan
 > Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation
 >
 >
 > As one who was unable to join the call Tuesday I am somewhat mystified
 > by this posting. Who made the assertion about waiver of privacy rights?
 > If the question is sent back to us, would our terms of reference be
 > changed? Where would this issue fit into our other priorities?  And what
 > would it say about the TF if we asked to have back the only resolution
 > that has successsfully completed our part of the PDP?  Is it impossible
 > to bring anything to a conclusion in this TF?
 >
 > (On a housekeeping note, maybe there is a problem with our list since I
 > did not receive Jordyn's original message nor any call-in notice for
 > Tuesday's call. Was one sent?)
 >
 >


--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org