Re: [Fwd: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation]

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't want do anticipate any comment from Milton or Kathy but 
Jordyns draft was strongly supported by the NCUC which originally
voted in favour of the recommendation.

tom


Am 11.08.2005 schrieb GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Forwarded from Steve Metalitz who is unable to post while on vacation.
> 
> (1) Pending an explanation of the merits of the objection, IPC opposes
> sending the note Jordyn drafted
> 
> (2) Since the constituency Ross and Paul represent voted against the
> recommendation origiinally, what is the basis for reconsideration?
> Normally such a motion could only be brought by someone who had voted
> yes originally
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Ryan Lehning <rlehning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steven J. Metalitz IIPA
> <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed Aug 10 11:45:18 2005
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation
> 
> Ryan,
> Thank yo very much for this response which I have posted to the list.
> Only task force members subscribed to the list can post, the reason why
> your posting failed.
>   Steve,
>  >(On a housekeeping note, maybe there is a problem with our list since I
>  >did not receive Jordyn's original message nor any call-in notice for
>  >Tuesday's call. Was one sent?)
>   Notice of the Whois task force call on 9 August did go to you via the
> Conference message system. The list seems to be in order so I am not
> sure why you did not receive Jordyn's original message.
> Sorry about this!
> Kind regards,
> Glen
> 
> 
> Ryan Lehning wrote:
>  > Glen,
>  >
>  > Steve Metalitz is out this week, but checking email and would like to
>  > make the following post in response to Ross Rader's post, to the Whois
>  > TF 123 list, but cannot do so remotely.  I attempted to do so for him
>  > earlier today but it appears the post hasn't shown up yet.  Can you make
>  > this posting for Steve to the list?
>  >
>  > Thanks and let me know if you have questions.
>  >
>  > Ryan Lehning
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Steve Metalitz
>  > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:32 AM
>  > To: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx; Jordyn A. Buchanan
>  > Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  > Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation
>  >
>  >
>  > As one who was unable to join the call Tuesday I am somewhat mystified
>  > by this posting. Who made the assertion about waiver of privacy rights?
>  > If the question is sent back to us, would our terms of reference be
>  > changed? Where would this issue fit into our other priorities?  And what
>  > would it say about the TF if we asked to have back the only resolution
>  > that has successsfully completed our part of the PDP?  Is it impossible
>  > to bring anything to a conclusion in this TF?
>  >
>  > (On a housekeeping note, maybe there is a problem with our list since I
>  > did not receive Jordyn's original message nor any call-in notice for
>  > Tuesday's call. Was one sent?)
>  >
>  >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w