Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #2

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The language is a placeholder for a concept that is current undefined,
let alone agreed on. I'm quite familiar with the range of proposals
regarding tiered access - which one does this refer to? Unless we're
pointing at a specific protocol or policy, I think its appropriate that
we remain silent on the issue...


On 31/08/2005 3:25 PM David W. Maher noted that;
> "may use...as a means" is hardly an institutionalization. I can't
> believe that we are so ignorant of tiered access.
> David
> 
> 
> At 02:13 PM 8/31/2005, Ross Rader wrote:
> 
> I think we should leave all possible resolutions open, but to
> institutionalize one specific one that we have no real understanding of
> doesn't seem prudent.
> 
> On 31/08/2005 2:30 PM David W. Maher noted that;
>> As stated in the preamble:
>> "The Task Force believes that there is an ongoing risk of conflict
>> between a registrar's or registry's legal obligations under local
>> privacy laws and their contractual obligations to ICANN.  TF2 Report,
>> Section 2.3,
> 
> http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/Whois-tf2-preliminary.html.
> 
> 
>> We are looking for procedures to reduce or eliminate the conflict.
> If we
>> restrict ourselves to making all (or some) data publicly available, or
>> concealing all (or some) data, we will never reach a consensus. Tiered
>> access as a concept is an obvious way forward to find some consensus to
>> solve this problem.
>> David
> 
> 
> 
>> At 11:55 AM 8/31/2005, Ross Rader wrote:
> 
>> On 30/08/2005 5:08 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that;
>>> This proposal is from the Registry Constituency.  It would add an
>>> additional paragraph to the end of the policy recommendation, as
>> follows:
> 
>>> 3) Registrars and registries may use tiered access as a means of
>>> complying with local legal requirements when applicable.
> 
>> We've not had any discussions regarding tiered access. It would be
>> appropriate to eliminate this from the draft and keep this discussion
>> off the table until we are in a position to deal with the technical and
>> policy issues surrounding the proposal.
> 
>> --
>> --
>> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
>>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>                 "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every
> instrument,
>>                  every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>>                  and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>>                         - Robert Collier
> 
> 
>> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
>> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
> 
> --
> --
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                 "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
>                  every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>                  and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>                         - Robert Collier
> 
> 
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org

- --
- --
Regards,



                       -rwr








                "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
                 every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
                 and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
                        - Robert Collier


Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDFgVV6sL06XjirooRAvW+AJ0UHpFyX5zDxCyu9Cc3dophhtArUQCfXyeZ
fqXJSd4HmZ7AsiNAoEE6Zkw=
=Ygrk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----